I'v used shark,it's completely based on standard from WFMCA.As long as the process definition is discribed by xpdl,shark can interpret it and work well.You can map shark's system user into role definited in process definition and application into real external procedure.It's quite flexable and extendable.
Xflow
Posted byAnonymous Userat
2004-07-31 02:27 PM
I would recommend considering my derivative XFlow2 that is based on XFlow API, but implemented differently, more on: http://www.kgionline.com/xflow2/
Hi I'm from Spain, I have to choose WFMOpen or XFlow and I want to ask some questions
Would you recommend me one or another? Why? What impressions do you have about them? Are there benefits using one of them?
What project presents more reliability, maturity...?
What application servers do they support (BEA, JBoss...)?
What DBMS do they support (Oracle, Postgre, mySQL,...)?
How are the data stored?? How can the data be accessed by other applications?
Can I read any study case about any of them??
Thanks a lot. Greetings
Question about your question :
why not Jbpm ? It's also j2ee based.
Sean
Replies to this comment
I'v used shark,it's completely based on standard from WFMCA.As long as the process definition is discribed by xpdl,shark can interpret it and work well.You can map shark's system user into role definited in process definition and application into real external procedure.It's quite flexable and extendable.
I would recommend considering my derivative XFlow2 that is based on XFlow API, but implemented differently, more on: http://www.kgionline.com/xflow2/
Replies to this comment