Skip to content.
Manageability
Search
Sections
Latest Updates
Home
Personal tools
You are not logged in
Log in
You are here:
Home
»
blog
»
stuff
»
How are dynamic languages shorter than static?
Comment
Above in this comment thread:
Is Chandler's Demise Evidence that Dynamic Languages Can't Scale?
»
dynamic v static
How are dynamic languages shorter than static?
Posted by
Anonymous User
at
2008-01-21 01:49 AM
Groovy:
class Person {
String firstName, lastName
}
Ruby:
class Person
attr_accessor :fname, :lname
end
How is the Ruby version shorter than the Groovy version?
Peace
-stephan
--
http://stephan.reposita.org
But Groovy is a dynamic language
Posted by
Anonymous User
at
2008-01-24 07:47 AM
"An agile dynamic language for the Java Platform" - http://groovy.codehaus.org/
Navigation
Home
blog
Software Engineering Concepts Revisited
archive
Java Open Source
stuff
visitors
reading
This site conforms to the following standards:
Section 508
WAI-AAA
Valid XHTML
Valid CSS and tableless layout
class Person {
String firstName, lastName
}
Ruby:
class Person
attr_accessor :fname, :lname
end
How is the Ruby version shorter than the Groovy version?
Peace
-stephan
--
http://stephan.reposita.org